29 Candles, 18 Holes

Today was John's 29th Birthday!! (Can you guess where he spent the morning???)

President Bush in Budapest

It was pretty surprising to wake up this morning and find a picture of President Bush giving a speech in Budapest on the front page of the newspaper. It's not often that Hungary makes the front page, and I was pretty proud to see the beautiful panorama of Budapest there in the background... :-)

(Read a transcript of his speech here)

Hungary, the Cold War, and an American Disappointment

(posted by John)

Below is an excerpt from a really interesting article in today's Washington Post. If you're not acquainted with the 1956 Hungarian Revolution against the Soviet occupation, you can read more about it here:
"Testament of Revolution" (online book)
1956 Hungarian Revolution (Wikipedia article)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come Clean in Hungary: Behind the '56 Revolt
By Charles Gati. Wednesday, June 21, 2006; Page A21

President Bush will be in Budapest tomorrow to visit a good ally -- a member of the coalition of the willing. The first item on his agenda, according to the White House, is to "celebrate Hungary's historic sacrifices in the name of freedom by commemorating the 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution." Topics of mutual interest will follow.

The president should indeed join Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany -- Hungary's Tony Blair -- to celebrate that country's recent achievements. But commemorating 1956 is a different matter.

The truth is that at a critical juncture in the Cold War, when Hungarians rose against their Soviet oppressors, the United States abandoned them. After 13 days of high drama, hope and despair, the mighty Soviet army prevailed. For its part, Washington offered a sad variation on "NATO": no action, talk only. The Eisenhower administration's policy of "liberation" and "rollback" turned out to be a hoax -- hypocrisy mitigated only by self-delusion. The more evident, if unstated, goal was to roll back the Democrats from Capitol Hill rather than liberate Central and Eastern Europe from Soviet tyranny.

Until the Soviet tanks rolled in, the Hungarians believed what Washington had proclaimed. They did not know that the United States was unprepared to help them and that a few high officials even expected some political and foreign policy benefits from a Soviet invasion. Vice President Richard Nixon explained to his colleagues at a top-secret National Security Council meeting in July 1956 that "it wouldn't be an unmixed evil, from the point of view of U.S. interest, if the Soviet iron fist were to come down again on the Soviet bloc."

In a similarly cynical vein, American-run Radio Free Europe in Germany encouraged the hapless insurgents to go all the way against the Kremlin and even broadcast lessons on how to make molotov cocktails.

We now know from Russian archives that the Hungarians did have a chance to gain some of what they sought. For on Oct. 30, one week after the revolt began, members of the Soviet Presidium (as the Politburo was called then) unanimously voted not to use military force. Their decision came in the wake of a series of conciliatory, post-Stalin policies, such as the 1955 Soviet withdrawal from Austria and reconciliation with Yugoslavia -- both of which are neighbors of Hungary -- as well as the first summit with the United States in a decade. In the end, the Kremlin intervened because it feared that the situation would spin out of control both in Hungary and elsewhere in the Soviet bloc. Radio Free Europe's exaggerated rhetoric only amplified these fears.

The United States, according to the usual version of what happened, could not help the Hungarians because any action would have triggered a military confrontation with Moscow. This explanation misses the point: There were actions short of war that Washington might have taken. It could certainly have urged the Hungarians to temporize and pursue limited, evolutionary goals. It could have taken the issue to the United Nations before, and not after, the Soviet crackdown. In an imaginative move toward post-Stalin detente, it could have proposed immediate talks about withdrawing American forces from a small Western European country in exchange for Soviet withdrawal from Hungary.

Instead, Washington offered only hope, no help. "Poor fellows, poor fellows," President Dwight Eisenhower said privately as he campaigned for reelection. "I wish there were some way of helping them." (Read More)

Thank you!

(posted by Zsofi)

The other day one of our friends here in Texas called us and asked some great questions about raising support. Things like:
Where we are going to live in Hungary?
Are we going to have health insurance?
Is it a safe place for children?
Are we going to live completely off of support or also work alongside our ministry (tent-making)?
What kind of churches are we going to work with?
Am I (Zsofi) going to do counseling? If so, in a clinic or a church?
He was even interested in what theoretical approach my school in Germany had toward Christian Psychology.
It was really encouraging to see how interested he was and how much thought he has put into these questions. Thank you Ralph, if you are reading our post!

We also want to thank you all who have been encouraging to us in one or the other way. Your support means a lot to us. You know devoting our lives to serve Christ in Hungary is a great adventure but we definitely could not do it without friends and people of God along the way who believe in what we do, encourage us, lift us up in prayer, and are willing to help us with their resources.